Investigate, verify,
and monitor.
Start with Deep Search to investigate a question, or choose Monitoring to review changes in a known case. Each workflow brings source notes, evidence review, and findings together.
Investigate
Open a scoped case around a person, alias, handle, phone number, or artifact.
Verify
Review the signals with evidence, provenance, and analyst-backed judgment.
Monitor
Keep watching for new appearances, exposures, and risk changes over time.
Choose the support your case needs.
Choose a one-time investigation or recurring monitoring. The sources and methods depend on your question, the identifiers you provide, and what is lawfully available. Teams can discuss shared access and review requirements.
Core products
Use Deep Search for a one-time investigation and Monitoring for recurring review of a known case.
Supporting capabilities
Phone, facial, metadata, network, location, and dark web methods strengthen evidence inside those two workflows.
Enterprise packaging
Discuss team access, evidence exports, security review, and procurement requirements before starting.
Investigate a question or follow a known case.
Deep Search provides a scoped report with findings and next steps. Monitoring reviews agreed sources over time and reports relevant changes, unresolved leads, and coverage gaps.
Choose the OSINT monitoring workflow when the baseline already exists and the job is recurring public-signal review, not first-pass discovery.
Deep Search
Start a scoped digital investigation with analyst-backed evidence, verification, and a clear case summary.
- Scoped case intake
- Cross-source evidence gathering
- Analyst-backed review
Continuous Monitoring
Track new activity, risk shifts, and evidence changes over time after the case is already known.
- Recurring scans
- Change detection
- Alert and history timeline
Understand the evidence on each platform.
Read the guides to see what public profiles can reveal, how to check a possible match, and which questions need more evidence.
Match the research methods to your question.
Depending on the case, reviewers may compare images, aliases, public records, metadata, or place references. Available sources and the agreed scope determine which methods can be used.
Capabilities that deepen a live investigation
Use these when a case needs stronger attribution, provenance, relationship mapping, or location context before action is taken.
Phone corroboration
Workflow destinationSupport attribution with phone-linked entities, carrier context, and account correlation.
Facial Recognition Search
Workflow destinationSupport image-led verification, identity confirmation, and reused-photo discovery.
Metadata and provenance review
Workflow destinationUse metadata and file-level clues to strengthen provenance and technical validation.
Relationship mapping
Workflow destinationMap relationships, repeated connections, and network context around a target or alias.
Geospatial corroboration
Workflow destinationAdd public place references, landmark checks, and timeline consistency to the case file.
Capabilities that sharpen ongoing monitoring
Use these when recurring coverage needs stronger exposure signals, reappearance clues, or escalation context over time.
Dark Web Monitoring
Workflow destinationAdd breach, exposure, and underground mention signals to active investigations and monitoring programs.
Phone corroboration
Workflow destinationSupport attribution with phone-linked entities, carrier context, and account correlation.
Facial Recognition Search
Workflow destinationSupport image-led verification, identity confirmation, and reused-photo discovery.
Geospatial corroboration
Workflow destinationAdd public place references, landmark checks, and timeline consistency to the case file.
Plan an investigation workflow for your team.
Discuss how your team will review evidence, share findings, and manage access. Agree on scope, security requirements, and support before rollout.
Research across available sources
Source availability varies by platform, language, and jurisdiction. Case scoping identifies accessible sources and relevant limits; reports distinguish reviewed evidence from unavailable information.
Trust, provenance, and compliance
Compliance-aware handling
Cases and evidence need clear operating boundaries when they touch sensitive investigations and regulated environments.
Secure evidence handling
Sensitive uploads, reports, and case artifacts require controlled access, retention rules, and strong storage hygiene.
Evidence-first reporting
Outputs should preserve context, provenance, and review state so customers can tell signal from proof.